Harris v. Hardeman County Sheriff Dept et al
| Martha J Harris |
| Hardeman County Sheriff Dept, County Jail and Deputies, Doolen, Daniel Sparks, Sturgers, Mike Kennamore, Billy Dewis, Brown, Patrick Perry, Jinna Pittman, Randall Grantham, Carey, Hunt, Haley, Courtney, Scott Kelly and Joyce Phillips |
| 1:2013cv01100 |
| March 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Jackson Office |
| Hardeman |
| Edward G. Bryant |
| James D. Todd |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER TO MODIFY THE DOCKET, DENYING MOTION TO REMOVE MAGISTRATE JUDGE, DENYING PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS, ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, CERTIFYING AN APPEAL WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH AND DENYING LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS 53 64 55 63 62 . Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 6/10/15. (Todd, James)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO MODIFY THE DOCKET, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS, ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND GRANTING DEFENDANT HALE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 37 47 . Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 11/7/14. (Todd, James)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 5 , ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND ORDER TO ISSUE AND SERVE PROCESS ON THE REMAINING DEFENDANTS. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 10/22/13. (Todd, James)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
