Sanders v. Jones
Plaintiff: Amy Sanders
Defendant: Lamar Jones
Case Number: 1:2014cv01239
Filed: September 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Jackson Office
County: Decatur
Presiding Judge: J. Daniel Breen
Presiding Judge: Edward G. Bryant
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 71 MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 1/24/19. (mbm)
November 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge J. Daniel Breen on 11/24/15. (Breen, J.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sanders v. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Sanders
Represented By: Leanne A. Thorne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lamar Jones
Represented By: James I. Pentecost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?