Stevenson v. Perry
Petitioner: Sam Edward Stevenson
Respondent: Grady Perry
Case Number: 1:2016cv01052
Filed: March 14, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Jackson Office
County: Hardeman
Presiding Judge: J. Daniel Breen
Presiding Judge: Edward G. Bryant
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 11/27/2018. (mbb)
February 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER DENYING 8 MOTION TO DISMISS AND DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO ANSWER THE PETITION. Signed by Chief Judge J. Daniel Breen on 2/8/17. (Breen, J.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stevenson v. Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sam Edward Stevenson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Grady Perry
Represented By: Keith Hollingshead-Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?