Lambert v. Perry
James Lambert |
Grady Perry |
1:2016cv02783 |
September 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Jackson Office |
Hardeman |
J. Daniel Breen |
Edward G. Bryant |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 6/13/2018. (mbb) |
Filing 18 ORDER DENYING 10 MOTION FOR COUNSEL, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 15 MOTION TO DISMISS, GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETITION, AND DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND FORM. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 9/27/17. (mbm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lambert v. Perry | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: James Lambert | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Grady Perry | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.