Massengill v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
Plaintiff: Jennifer Massengill
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Secuity
Case Number: 1:2018cv01175
Filed: September 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: J Daniel Breen
Referring Judge: Edward G Bryant
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42:1383
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2018 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jennifer Massengill. All Defendants. U.S. Attorney General served on 10/31/2018. U.S. Attorney served on 10/25/2018. (Beal, Lena)
September 12, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(mbm)
September 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 9/12/18. (mbm)
September 12, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (mbm)
September 12, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Administrative track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm)
September 12, 2018 Filing 3 Judge J. Daniel Breen and Magistrate Judge Edward G. Bryant added. (mbm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/12/2018: #1 Magistrate Judicial Card) (csf).
September 12, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis proposed order submitted by Jennifer Massengill. (Beal, Lena)
September 12, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Secuity, filed by Jennifer Massengill. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Commissioner, #3 Summons Michael Dunavant, #4 Summons Jeff Sessions)(Beal, Lena)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Massengill v. Commissioner of Social Secuity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Massengill
Represented By: Lena D. Beal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Secuity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?