United States of America v. Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System et al
United States of America |
Calvin Bailey |
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System |
1:2018cv01181 |
September 18, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
S Thomas Anderson |
Edward G Bryant |
Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER OF GARNISHEE to #1 Application for Writ of Garnishment filed by Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(skc) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by United States of America Response and Objection to Defendant's Request to Appeal as to Garnishment (proposed order submitted) (Zoccola, Barbara) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of request to appeal as to garnishment by Calvin Bailey. (Attachments: #1 Claim for excemption form, #2 Location request on appeal, #3 envelope)(mbm) |
Filing 4 WRIT OF GARNISHMENT issued. (mbm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Administrative track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm) |
Filing 2 Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson and Magistrate Judge Edward G. Bryant added. (mbm) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment (PLEASE ISSUE), filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zoccola, Barbara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.