Gwin v. McWherter et al
Robert Irwin Gwin |
Ned Ray McWherter and TN Board of Parole |
1:2019cv01112 |
June 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Jackson Office |
Charmiane G Claxton |
James D Todd |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER SEVERING CLAIMS, DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS, CERTIFYING AN APPEAL WOULD NOT BE TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH, NOTIFYING PLAINTIFF OF APPELLATE FILING FEE AND NOTIFYING PLAINTIFF OF RESTRICTIONS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 6/4/19. (mbm) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Ned Ray McWherter, TN Board of Parole, filed by Robert Irwin Gwin. Note to Record: Case opened as new case pursuant to 6/4/19 Order - DE# 20 in case #2:17-cv-2054. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 envelope, #4 judge's card)(mbm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/4/2019: #5 magistrate judicial card) (jae). |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 2/24/17. (mbm) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Irwin Gwin. (Attachments: #1 Trust fund info, #2 envelope)(mbm) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Irwin Gwin. (Attachments: #1 Trust fund info, #2 envelope)(mbm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.