Cruz v. Wal-Mart
Sandra Cruz |
Wal-Mart |
Kathy Blount |
1:2019cv01173 |
August 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
J Daniel Breen |
Jon A York |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 NOTICE by Sandra Cruz Notice of Service of Plaintiff's First Supplemental Responses to Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents (Sheng, Elaine) |
Filing 17 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jon A. York for all further proceedings. Judge J. Daniel Breen no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 9/25/19. (mbm) |
Filing 16 NOTICE by Wal-Mart of Service of Initial Disclosures (Wilson, Keely) |
Filing 15 NOTICE by Sandra Cruz Notice of Service of Plaintiff's Responses to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents and Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures (Sheng, Elaine) |
Filing 14 Please ignore. Docket entered in error. (ars) |
Filing 13 SCHEDULING ORDER: ADR deadline is 12/5/2019. Amended Pleadings due by 11/12/2019. Discovery due by 6/15/2020. Joinder of Parties due by 11/12/2019. Motions due by 7/15/2020.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jon A. York on 9/12/2019. (ars) |
Filing 12 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jon A. York: Scheduling Conference held on 9/12/2019. Present were attorneys Sheng and Wilson. Parties plan to submit consent form for Magistrate Judge to try case by end of week. Order to be entered. (Court Reporter FTR.) (ars) |
Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Wilson, Keely) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Elaine Sheng on behalf of Sandra Cruz (Sheng, Elaine) |
Filing 9 SETTING LETTER:Scheduling Conference set for 09/12/2019, 10:00 A.M. CT in Courtroom #3, 3rd Floor, Jackson Federal Courthouse, before Magistrate Judge Jon A. York. Please email the proposed joint scheduling order in the original Word format to ECF_Judge_York@tnwd.uscourts.gov one week prior to the scheduling conference. All Scheduling Conferences will be done in person before the Court. If you are unable to appear at this time, or if you need to make alternative arrangements, please contact the Judge's Case Manager at 731-421-9275 so we may reschedule. Please agree on a date and time with the opposing counsel before calling to facilitate the new date. ** REMINDER: FRCP 26(f) requires a 26(f) meeting to be held at least 21 days before a scheduling conference and the Rule 26(f) report to be filed with the court at least fourteen days before the scheduling conference. This case has been assigned to the Standard track. Please use the Standard Track Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order at http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LR162_Standard.doc Note that this is a NEW scheduling order template on which all scheduling orders will now be based. Counsel should review the Court's new ADR plan, file a Stipulation, and be prepared to report the name of a mediator to the Court during the Scheduling Conference. If the parties cannot agree upon a mediator one will be appointed by the Court after the scheduling conference.PLEASE NOTE: All attorneys who wish to participate in the Scheduling Conference MUST have filed a Notice of Appearance with the Court PRIOR to the date of the Conference and have full knowledge of the case. Note: Text only (ars) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by Wal-Mart of Service of First Interrogatories and RFP (Wilson, Keely) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Wal-Mart.(Wilson, Keely) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (mbm) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (mbm) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm) |
Filing 3 Judge J. Daniel Breen and Magistrate Judge Jon A. York added. (mbm) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal-Mart. (Wilson, Keely) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wal-Mart STORES EAST, LP from Madison County Circuit Court, case number C-19-171 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-3144020), filed by Wal-Mart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wilson, Keely) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.