Pacheco-Lopez v. Madison County Sheriff's Department et al
Willmer Omar Pacheco-Lopez |
State of Tennessee and Madison County Sheriff's Department |
1:2019cv01176 |
August 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Jackson Office |
Charmiane G Claxton |
James D Todd |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF HORTON LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND SEVERING PLAINTIFF PACHECO-LOPEZ'S CASE. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 8/21/19. (mbm) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO MODIFY THE DOCKET, GRANTING PLAINTIFF PACHECO-LOPEZ'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, GRANTING PLAINTIFF HORTON ADDITIONAL TIME TO COMPLY, AND DISMISSING ALL OTHER PLAINTIFFS. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 8/7/19. (mbm) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Willmer Omar Pacheco-Lopez. (Attachments: #1 statement, #2 envelope)(mbm) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm) |
Filing 1 Note to record: Case opened pursuant to 8/21/19 Order - DE# 26 in case # 1:18-cv-1241. PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Willmer Omar Pacheco-Lopez. (Attachments: #1 plaintiff signature, #2 statement of claim cont., #3 envelope)(mbm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.