Cross v. Mnuchin et al
| Lillian Cross |
| Alex M Azar, II, Seema Verma, Pioneer Credit Recovery and Steven T. Mnuchin |
| 1:2019cv02664 |
| September 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| J Daniel Breen |
| Jon A York |
| Contract: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Filing fee $ 400 paid, receipt number ATNWDC-3215033. (Shaw, Amber) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Settlement With Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc. by Lillian Cross (Shaw, Amber) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Lillian Cross (Shaw, Amber) |
| Filing 17 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Steven Mnuchin on 10-9-2019, filed by Lillian Cross. (Shaw, Amber) |
| Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Seema Verma on 10-7-2019, filed by Lillian Cross. (Shaw, Amber) |
Filing 15
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED #12 MOTION OF DEFENDANT PIONEER CREDIT RECOVERY, INC. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 10/31/19. (mbm)
|
| Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Pioneer Credit Recovery identifying Corporate Parent Navient Corporation for Pioneer Credit Recovery.. (Brown, Reba) |
| Filing 13 Certificate of Certificate of Consultation by Pioneer Credit Recovery. (Brown, Reba) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, proposed order submitted by Pioneer Credit Recovery. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brown, Reba) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 10/3/19. (mbm)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND DEFERRING RULING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 10/3/19. (mbm)
|
| NOTICE to all parties: This case was incorrectly opened in the Western Division of the Western District. It was transferred to the Jackson office and the case number has been modified. Please take notice of the case number, as the only change in the number will be the divisional code at the beginning of the case number. (Ex: 1:XX-cv-XXXX or 2:XX-cv-XXXX). The old case has been closed and will contain a case flag that it is closed. Particular attention should be used when selecting the case number during CM/ECF filing of future pleadings to ensure that you are filing in the correct (open) case. The new case number is 1:19-CV-2664. Please list the correct case number on all future pleadings. (jld) Modified on 10/2/2019 (jld). |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Steven T. Mnuchin. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jld) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Alex M Azar, II. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jld) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Seema Verma. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jld) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Pioneer Credit Recovery. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jld) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jld) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 2 Judge Mark S. Norris and Chief Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo added. (jld) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Rec # ATNWDC 318006 $400.00) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(Shaw, Amber) Modified on 10/1/2019 to add rec # (jae). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
