Donald v. Kelloggs Jackson et al
| Joshua D. Donald |
| Kelloggs Jackson and Kelloggs Corp. |
| 1:2020cv01240 |
| October 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| James D Todd |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION for extension of time and change of date by Joshua D. Donald. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(mbm) |
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 11/18/20. (skc)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for extension of time by Joshua D. Donald. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(mbm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), DISMISSING COMPLAINT, AND GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 10/27/20. (skc)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (skc) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joshua D. Donald. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(skc) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Under 42 USC 1983 filed by Joshua D. Donald. (Attachments: #1 envelope, #2 Judge Card)(skc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/26/2020: #3 Judicial Card) (btg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
