Austin v. The Carlstar Group, LLC
| Jamarus Austin |
| The Carlstar Group, LLC |
| 1:2020cv01272 |
| December 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| S Thomas Anderson |
| Jon A York |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for 4/1/2021 09:00 AM before Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson. The proceeding will be done via Microsoft Teams video conference. The Court will email the parties an invitation for the video conference prior to the proceeding.Counsel should submit any exhibits to be offered to the Judge's ECF mailbox prior to the proceeding.The public may also access the video proceeding. If the public and/or media wish to attend in the video proceeding, please click on the following link to request access information: #https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/videohearings The access information will be delivered via email to the email address from which the request originated.Parties should consult the instructions for #Joining a Meeting in Teams or #Joining a Meeting Without a Teams Account. Please email Maurice_Bryson@tnwd.uscourts.gov for any questions.(mbb) |
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Carlstar Group, LLC. (Lindley, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by The Carlstar Group, LLC.(Lindley, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Taylor Derielle Flake-Lawson on behalf of The Carlstar Group, LLC (Flake-Lawson, Taylor) |
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION #9 . Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 1/6/21. (skc)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer proposed order submitted by The Carlstar Group, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Certificate of Consultation)(Lindley, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons in a Civil Matter and Complaint served on CT Corporation System Registered Agent for Service of Process The Carlstar Group, LLC on 12/16/2020, filed by Jamarus Austin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Executed Green Card and Receipt, #2 Exhibit USPS Tracking)(Tollison, Mitchell) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Geoffrey A. Lindley on behalf of The Carlstar Group, LLC (Lindley, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Carlstar Group)(mbm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (mbm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (mbm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm) |
| Filing 2 Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jon A. York added. (mbm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT of Jamarus Austin against The Carlstar Group, LLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3502624), filed by Jamarus Austin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Tollison, Mitchell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Austin v. The Carlstar Group, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jamarus Austin | |
| Represented By: | Mitchell G. Tollison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Carlstar Group, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Geoffrey A. Lindley |
| Represented By: | Taylor Derielle Flake-Lawson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
