Long v. Mashburn et al
| Brian Marquince Long |
| Former Lt. Mashburn, CCA and Core Civic |
| 1:2021cv01120 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and assessing $350.00 filing fee in accordance with PLRA, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 08/30/2021. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (cdi) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Brian Marquince Long. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum)(cdi) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brian Marquince Long. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Transactions)(cdi) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Brian Marquince Long. (Attachments: #1 Complaint- Handwritten (sent in separate envelope), #2 Letter, #3 envelope (for handwritten complaint), #4 envelope (for typed complaint))(cdi) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/23/2021: #5 Judicial assignment card) (jae). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
