Barnett et al v. Anderson
| Cedric Barnett and Tiffany Barnett |
| Judge J. Blake Anderson |
| 1:2022cv01042 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Letter requesting information to be docketed in all cases. (Attachments: #1 envelope, #2 Clerk's letter) (mbm)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate executed by Plaintiffs only. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(skc)
|
|
Filing 5
Letter from Cedrick Barnett. (Attachments: #1 envelope) (skc)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Cedric Barnett. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(skc)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cedric Barnett. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(mbm)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT against J. Blake Anderson, filed by Cedric Barnett. (Attachments: #1 Notice of lawsuit and request to waive service of summons, #2 envelope)(mbm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/9/2022: #3 Judicial Cards) (csf).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
