Faulcon v. United States of America
| Christopher Faulcon |
| United States of America |
| 1:2022cv01059 |
| April 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| J Daniel Breen |
| Jon A York |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Letter from Christopher Faulcon. (Attachments: #1 attachment - Envelope, #2 envelope) (mbm) |
Filing 14
ORDER DENYING #13 MOTION TO UNSEAL PRESENTENCE REPORT, CONSTRUING CLAIMS, AND RESETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 5/23/2022. (cdi)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Unseal PSR filed by Christopher Faulcon. (per Order in 17-10106 DE #558) (Attachments: #1 envelope)(skc) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of additional claim to 2255 by Christopher Faulcon. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(mbm) |
| Filing 11 Letter from Christopher Faulcon requesting certified mailings. (Attachments: #1 envelope) (mbm) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Naya Bedini on behalf of United States of America (Bedini, Naya) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of filing additional proof by Christopher Faulcon. (Attachments: #1 attachments, #2 envelope)(mbm) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RELEASE TRIAL COUNSEL FROM ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE #7 . Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 4/15/22. (skc)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Release Trial Counsel from Attorney-Client Privilege (Proposed Order Submitted) by United States of America. (Morrow, William) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S #3 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, DENYING #4 MOTION FOR DISCOVERY, AND DIRECTING UNITED STATES TO RESPOND TO THE 2255 PETITION. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 4/5/22. (mbm)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by William Joshua Morrow on behalf of United States of America (Morrow, William) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Conduct Discovery by Christopher Faulcon. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(mbm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for additional time to submit Memorandum by Christopher Faulcon. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(mbm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE 2255 against United States of America, filed by Christopher Faulcon. (Attachments: #1 envelope, #2 Judge's card)(mbm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Faulcon v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Christopher Faulcon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | 2255 AUSA - Jackson |
| Represented By: | Naya Bedini |
| Represented By: | William Joshua Morrow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
