Clark v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
| Michael Clark |
| Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
| Circuit Court Clerk Justin Emerson |
| 1:2022cv01089 |
| May 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| J Daniel Breen |
| Jon A York |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal, Notice of Filing Revised Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Revised Exhibit 1)(Neal, Brian) |
| Filing 14 SETTING LETTER: Jury Trial set for 7/10/2023 at 9:30 AM in Jackson Courtroom 2 before Judge J. Daniel Breen. Pretrial Conference set for 7/5/2023 at 10:00 AM in Jackson Courtroom 2 before Judge J. Daniel Breen. Motions in Limine, Proposed Jury Instructions and Joint Proposed Pretrial Order due by 6/28/2023. (ejc) |
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 7/25/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 7/25/2022. ADR deadline is 8/31/2022. Discovery due by 2/6/2023. Motions due by 3/6/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jon A. York on 6/9/2022. (ars)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Joint Notice of Selection of Mediator (Neal, Brian) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kate Hamilton on behalf of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Hamilton, Kate) |
| Filing 10 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jon A. York: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 6/8/2022. Attys Gammill and Neal present. Order to be entered after parties file joint notice of selection of mediator. (Court Reporter Teams.) (ars) |
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Hamilton, Kate) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Certified Policy)(Neal, Brian) |
| Filing 7 SETTING LETTER:TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference set for Wednesday, June 8, 2022, 9:45 AM CT before Magistrate Judge Jon A. York. Please email the proposed joint scheduling order in the original Word format to ECF_Judge_York@tnwd.uscourts.gov one week prior to the scheduling conference. A phone number will be emailed to counsel prior to the hearing date.If you are unable to appear at this time, or if you need to make alternative arrangements, please contact the Judge's Case Manager at 731-421-9275 so we may reschedule. Please agree on a date and time with the opposing counsel before calling to facilitate the new date. ** REMINDER: FRCP 26(f) requires a 26(f) meeting to be held at least 21 days before a scheduling conference and the Rule 26(f) report to be filed with the court at least fourteen days before the scheduling conference. This case has been assigned to the Standard track. Please use the Standard Track Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order at # http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LR162_Standard.docCounsel should review the Court's new ADR plan, file a Stipulation, and be prepared to report the name of a mediator to the Court during the Scheduling Conference. If the parties cannot agree upon a mediator one will be appointed by the Court after the scheduling conference.PLEASE NOTE: All attorneys who wish to participate in the Scheduling Conference MUST have filed a Notice of Appearance with the Court PRIOR to the date of the Conference and have full knowledge of the case. Note: Text only (ars) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (mbm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (mbm) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm) |
| Filing 3 Judge J. Daniel Breen and Magistrate Judge Jon A. York added. (mbm) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Neal, Brian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company from Chester County Circuit Court, case number 22-cv-11 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3870244), filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - State court file, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Neal, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
