Mathews v. Tyson Foods et al
| William A Mathews |
| Tyson Foods and Tyson Farms, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv01192 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| S Thomas Anderson |
| Jon A York |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for 3/2/2023 09:00 AM in Jackson Courtroom 1 before Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson. (mbb)
|
|
Filing 12
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by All Defendants.(Holmes, Rodrick)
|
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by All Defendants. (Holmes, Rodrick)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by All Defendants. (Holmes, Rodrick)
|
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Tyson Farms, Inc., Tyson Foods. (Holmes, Rodrick)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Emily A Warwick on behalf of All Defendants (Warwick, Emily)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Rodrick D. Holmes on behalf of All Defendants (Holmes, Rodrick)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Tyson Farms)(mbm)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (mbm)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (mbm)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm)
|
|
Filing 2
Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson and Magistrate Jon A. York added. (mbm)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3965127), filed by William A Mathews. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Luna, Teresa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
