Watts et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
| Amber Nicole Watts and Brooke Adriana Gomez |
| Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Distributors, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Group |
| Kathy Blount |
| 1:2022cv01223 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| S Thomas Anderson |
| Jon A York |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for 2/2/2023 09:00 AM in Jackson Courtroom 1 before Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson. (mbb) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (skc) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (skc) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (skc) |
| Filing 5 Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jon A. York added. (skc) |
| Filing 4 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. ANSWER to Complaint by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc..(Bibb, John) |
| Filing 3 Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. ANSWER to Complaint by Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc..(Bibb, John) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal,, Written Notice to Adverse Parties of the Filing of the Notice of Removal (Bibb, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. from Madison County Circuit Court, case number C-22-154 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATNWDC-3991822), filed by Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - Summons and Complaint of Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Summons and Complaint of Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.)(Bibb, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
