Coleman v. Parris et al
| Wesley Coleman and Welsey Dawone Coleman |
| Mike Parris, FNU Olroyed, FNU Jones and John Evans |
| 1:2022cv01225 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Wesley Coleman. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(skc) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing by Wesley Coleman. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(skc) |
| Filing 4 Per 11/2/22 E-mail Rcvd. - CASE: 1:22-cv-01225 DETAILS: Case transferred from Tennessee Western has been opened in U.S. District Court - Eastern District of Tennessee as case 3:22-cv-00387, filed 11/02/2022. (skc) |
Filing 3
ORDER OF TRANSFER pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a), signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 10/31/2022. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Wesley Coleman. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(mbm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/17/2022: #2 Judicial Cards) (csf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
