Ballard, III v. United States of America
| Thomas Kelly Ballard, III |
| United States of America |
| 1:2022cv01226 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| S Thomas Anderson |
| Jon A York |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Defendant's Objections to Certian Aspects of The Government's Motion re DE #6 , MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by Thomas Kelly Ballard, III. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(gkp) |
Filing 8
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO 2255 PETITION (re #6 ). Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 11/28/22. (cdi)
|
| Filing 7 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply filed by United States of America has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: Proposed Orders must be submitted to the appropriate Judge's ECF email account in Word Format. The Judge's ECF email address can be found at our website. Text should reflect compliance (Ex. Proposed Order submitted to Judge). If the Proposed Order has not been emailed to the Judge, please do so at this time. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (skc) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by United States of America. (Petro, Emily) |
| Filing 5 Memorandum of Law in Support of 28 U.S.C. Section 2255 Motion by Thomas Kelly Ballard, III. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 envelope)(mbm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING UNITED STATES TO RESPOND TO THE 2255 PETITION. Signed by Chief Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 10/31/2022. (mbb)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily E. Petro on behalf of United States of America (Petro, Emily) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (mbm) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE 2255 against United States of America, filed by Thomas Kelly Ballard, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A & B, #2 envelope)(mbm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/17/2022: #3 Judge's card) (mbm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ballard, III v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Thomas Kelly Ballard, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | 2255 AUSA - Jackson |
| Represented By: | Emily E. Petro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
