Blocker v. Genovese
Kevin Genovese and Sharon Rose |
Maurice Blocker and Ricky M. Blocker |
1:2022cv01270 |
December 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
J Daniel Breen |
Jon A York |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO TRANSFER CASE. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 12/22/22. (mbm) |
Filing 6 Case initiation fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 100000091, Was received on today's date. (gkp) |
Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE IN FORMA PAUPERIS AFFIDAVIT AND TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT OR PAY $5.00 HABEAS FILING FEE. Signed by Judge J. Daniel Breen on 12/12/22. (mbm) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas Scott Bolduc on behalf of Sharon Rose (Bolduc, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 AMENDED Petition Under Section 2254 For Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Maurice Blocker. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(gkp) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (gkp) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody, filed by Maurice Blocker. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(gkp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/7/2022: #2 Judge card) (gkp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.