Crutchfield v. Jaccson et al
| Dalton Eric Daniel Crutchfield, Jr. |
| Carl Jaccson and Kent Treece |
| 1:2023cv01033 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 3/20/2023. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 4 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Dalton Eric Daniel Crutchfield, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Transaction History, #2 envelope)(gkp) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Comply with 28 U.S.C. 1915(A)(1)-(2) or Pay the $402 Civil Filing Fee, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 03/06/2023. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (gkp) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Carl Jaccson, Kent Treece, filed by Dalton Eric Daniel Crutchfield, Jr. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(gkp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/24/2023: #2 Case Assignment Label) (gkp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
