Muse v. Hagg et al
| Royland Demetric Muse |
| Hagg, John Mehr, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE |
| 1:2023cv01060 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 4/24/2023. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 4 Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (gkp) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (gkp) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Royland Demetric Muse. (gkp) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights Under 42 USC 1983 against All Defendants, filed by Royland Demetric Muse.(gkp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/14/2023: #1 Statement of Claim) #2 Judicial Label) (gkp). Modified on 4/14/2023 to add documents to complaint(gkp). (Attachment 2 replaced on 4/14/2023 to reflect appropriate Judicial Label) (gkp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
