Curran, III v. Fronabarger et al
Plaintiff: John F. Curran, III
Defendant: Carl A. Fronabarger and State of Tennessee
Case Number: 1:2023cv01064
Filed: April 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: S Thomas Anderson
Referring Judge: Jon A York
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2023 Filing 17 Certificate of Service filed by John F. Curran, III. (mlk)
May 26, 2023 Filing 16 Pro Se to Plaintiff's Motion to File a Reply Brief to State of Tenness's Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by John F. Curran, III. (mlk)
May 26, 2023 Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re #13 MOTION and Memorandum of Law filed by John F. Curran, III. (mlk)
May 15, 2023 Filing 14 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION for Hearing, #8 MOTION Injunctive Relief proposed order submitted filed by State of Tennessee. (Donica, Eric)
May 15, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by State of Tennessee. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Donica, Eric)
May 15, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Donica on behalf of State of Tennessee (Donica, Eric)
May 10, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION to Amend #1 Pro Se Complaint by John F. Curran, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit amended complaint, #2 Exhibit summons, #3 envelope)(agj)
May 8, 2023 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John F. Curran, III as to State of Tennessee. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae)
April 28, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION for Evidentiary Hearing, Declaratory Order by John F. Curran, III. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 envelope)(agj)
April 28, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION for Injunctive Relief by John F. Curran, III. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 envelope)(agj)
April 20, 2023 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to State of Tennessee. The summons issued and returned to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail in order to effect service. (csf)
April 20, 2023 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Carl A. Fronabarger. The summons issued and returned to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail in order to effect service. (csf)
April 12, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (csf)
April 12, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (csf)
April 12, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf)
April 12, 2023 Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION to Not Pay Filing Fee. Complaint seeking salvage compensation, an exemption to the filing fee requirement. by John F. Curran, III. (csf)
April 12, 2023 Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by John F. Curran, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Summons for Fronabarger, #4 Summons for State of Tennessee, #5 Envelope)(csf)
April 12, 2023 Pursuant to Administrative Order 2013-05, this case has been assigned to the United States magistrate judge for management of all pretrial matters. Pursuant to Local Rule 4.1(b)(1), the plaintiff shall present the Clerk with a properly completed summons for each defendant, and the Clerk shall issue the summons(es) to the plaintiff for service on the defendant(s). (csf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Curran, III v. Fronabarger et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John F. Curran, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carl A. Fronabarger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Tennessee
Represented By: Eric Donica
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?