Phillips v. Anderson et al
| Stephen Phillips |
| FNU Anderson, FNU New Case Manager of K Pod, FNU Faulkin, FNU Cross, FNU Hall, FNU Mann and FNU Springfield |
| 1:2023cv01067 |
| April 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and assessing $350.00 filing fee in accordance with PLRA, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 4/25/2023. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (skc) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Stephen Phillips. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(skc) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Stephen Phillips. (Attachments: #1 trust fund balance sheets, #2 envelope)(skc) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Under 42 USC 1983 against All Defendants filed by Stephen Phillips. (Attachments: #1 envelope, #2 Judge Label)(skc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
