Mack v. Rettig et al
| Darius Mack |
| Charles Rettig, Janet Yellen, US Department of the Treasury and US Internal Revenue Service |
| 1:2023cv01105 |
| May 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| J Daniel Breen |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Jon A York |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Affidavit of Poverty by Darius Mack. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Trust Fund Information, #3 envelope)(gkp) |
Filing 4
ORDER directing Plaintiff to comply with 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(A)(1)-(2) or pay the $402 civil filing fee, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 6/2/2023. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 3 Judge J. Daniel Breen and Magistrate Judge Jon A. York no longer assigned to case. (gkp) |
| Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-01 case reassigned to Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham. (gkp) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (gkp) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Damages against All Defendants, filed by Darius Mack. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(gkp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
