Carney v. Mayo et al
Elijah McHenry Carney |
R. Mayo, John Hamilton and Kyle Atkins |
1:2023cv01189 |
September 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Samuel H Mays |
Tu M Pham |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER directing Plaintiff to comply with 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) or pay the $402 civil filing fee, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 09/08/2023. (Mays, Samuel) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (gkp) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Elijah McHenry Carney. (gkp) |
Filing 1 Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights Under 42 USC 1983 against All Defendants, filed by Elijah McHenry Carney. (Attachments: #1 General Sessions Judgment, #2 General Sessions Judgment, #3 Letter, #4 Letter, #5 envelope)(gkp) |
Pursuant to Administrative Order 2019-01 case reassigned to Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham. Judge S. Thomas Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jon A. York no longer assigned to case. (gkp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.