Toomes v. Working et al
| Antonio Toomes |
| Michael Ryan Working and Clayburn Peeples |
| 1:2024cv01015 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Clayburn Peeples, Michael Ryan Working, filed by Antonio Toomes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit a, #2 Exhibit b, #3 Exhibit c, #4 Envelope)(jae) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and assessing $350.00 filing fee in accordance with PLRA, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 01/23/2024. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 3 Pro Se MOTION for Appoint of Counsel by Antonio Toomes. (csf) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antonio Toomes. (Attachments: #1 In Forma Pauperis Declaration, #2 Certificate)(csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against All Defendants, filed by Antonio Toomes. (Attachments: #1 General Information, #2 Inmate Affidavit, #3 Motion in the Circuit Court for 28th Judicial District in Crockett County, TN, #4 Envelope, #5 Case assignment label)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
