UnderCover, Inc. et al v. Rough Country, LLC
UnderCover, Inc. and Laurmark Enterprises, Inc. doing business as BAK Industries |
Rough Country, LLC |
1:2024cv01093 |
April 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Laurmark Enterprises, Inc., UnderCover, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent RealTruck Enterprise, Inc., Corporate Parent RealTruck Group, Inc., Corporate Parent RealTruck Intermediate Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent RealTruck Holdings, Inc., Corporate Parent RealTruck, Inc. for Laurmark Enterprises, Inc., UnderCover, Inc... (Burgener, Joshua) |
Filing 2 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,815,358; 8,690,224; 7,537,264; . (Burgener, Joshua) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Rough Country, LLC (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATNWDC-4399315), filed by UnderCover, Inc., Laurmark Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to be issued to Rough Country, LLC, #3 Exhibit A - '358 Patent, #4 Exhibit B - '224 Patent, #5 Exhibit C - '264 Patent, #6 Exhibit D - '358 Claim Chart, #7 Exhibit E - '224 Claim Chart, #8 Exhibit F - '264 Claim Chart)(Burgener, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.