Howard v. Henderson Police Department et al
| William Scott Howard, Sr |
| Henderson Police Department, Chester County Sheriff's Department and Unnamed Defendants 1-100 |
| 1:2025cv01018 |
| January 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| S Thomas Anderson |
| Jon A York |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (gkp) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (gkp) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by William Scott Howard, Sr. (gkp) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Under 42 USC 1983 against All Defendants, filed by William Scott Howard, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Judicial Label)(gkp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
