Taylor v. Methodist LeBonheur Healthcare
Plaintiff: Cheryl Taylor
Defendant: Methodist LeBonheur Healthcare
Case Number: 2:2008cv02678
Filed: October 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: Diane K. Vescovo
Presiding Judge: Diane K. Vescovo
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1981 Job Discrimination (Race)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton recused. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton on 11/2/2009. (Claxton, Charmiane)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor v. Methodist LeBonheur Healthcare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cheryl Taylor
Represented By: James R. Becker, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Methodist LeBonheur Healthcare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?