Chalmers v. Bell
Plaintiff: Tyrone Chalmers
Defendant: Ricky Bell
Case Number: 2:2009cv02051
Filed: January 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: Jon Phipps McCalla
Presiding Judge: Diane K. Vescovo
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 129 ORDER DENYING 112 THIRD MOTION FOR DISCOVERY, DENYING MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, AND DENYING LEAVE TO REQUEST ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY AT A LATER DATE. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 07/28/2022. (Norris, Mark)
June 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by Judge Mark S. Norris on 06/07/2022. (Norris, Mark)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chalmers v. Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone Chalmers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ricky Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?