CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Specialty Allows Corp.
Plaintiff: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Defendant: Specialty Allows Corp.
Case Number: 2:2009cv02170
Filed: March 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: Tu M. Pham
Presiding Judge: Tu M. Pham
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 49:11702(a)(4) Violations of Interstate Commerce A

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER DISMISSING CASE With Prejudice. Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 4/16/2010. (Anderson, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Specialty Allows Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CSX Transportation, Inc.
Represented By: Nicholas E. Bragorgos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Specialty Allows Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?