Nichols et al v. GMAC Home Mortgage Corporation et al
| Carl G. Nichols, III and Leise M. Nichols |
| GMAC Home Mortgage Corporation and McCurdy & Candler, LLC |
| Dewun R. Settle |
| 2:2010cv02072 |
| January 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Memphis Office |
| Shelby |
| S. Thomas Anderson |
| Charmiane G. Claxton |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 57 Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; DENYING 70 Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Counter-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; DENYING 66 Plaintiffs' Counter-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by U.S. District Judge Robert H. Cleland on 6/19/2013. (lgw)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER granting 83 Motion to Extend Deadline to file Supplemental Briefs. Defendant's Brief due by 5/15/2013 and Plaintiffs' Brief due by 5/22/2013.. Signed by U.S. District Judge Robert H. Cleland on 5/14/13. (lgw)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Awarding Attorney's Fees and Costs against Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendant in the amount of $1640.80. Signed by U.S. District Judge Robert H. Cleland on 7/26/2012. (lgw)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Dismissing without prejudice claims against Defendant McCurdy & Candler LLC and terminating as moot 25 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Robert H. Cleland on 5/11/12. (lgw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
