The Select Family of Staffing Companies v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Tennessee Western District The Select Family of Staffing Companies v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

The Select Family of Staffing Companies v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Plaintiff:	The Select Family of Staffing Companies
Defendant:	United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Case Number:	2:2010cv02534
Filed:	July 22, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office:	Memphis Office
County:	Shelby
Presiding Judge:	Charmiane G. Claxton
Presiding Judge:	Jon Phipps McCalla
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	05 U.S.C. § 551
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 24, 2011	Filing 40 ORDER adopting 39 Report and Recommendation and directing Clerk of Court to Administratively Close Case *this Order dismisses 7 EEOC's Motion to Dismiss in Case No. 10-2523 and 1 EEOC's Order to Show Cause Why an Administrative Subp oena Should not be Enforced in Case No. 10-2523; and denies as moot 16 Select Family's Motion to Strike Declaration of Katharine Kores in Case No. 10-2534*. Signed by Chief Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 3/24/11. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-02534-JPM-tmp, 2:10-cv-02589-JPM-tmp(McCalla, Jon)
March 23, 2011	Filing 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 EEOC's MOTION to Dismiss Complaint and Application for Order to Show Cause Why Subpoena Should not be Enforced; Order DENYING AS MOOT 16 Select Family's Motion to Strike Declaration of Katharine Kores. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on 3/22/11. (Pham, Tu)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 24, 2011

Filing 40 ORDER adopting 39 Report and Recommendation and directing Clerk of Court to Administratively Close Case ***this Order dismisses 7 EEOC's Motion to Dismiss in Case No. 10-2523 and 1 EEOC's Order to Show Cause Why an Administrative Subp oena Should not be Enforced in Case No. 10-2523; and denies as moot 16 Select Family's Motion to Strike Declaration of Katharine Kores in Case No. 10-2534***. Signed by Chief Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 3/24/11. Associated Cases: 2:10-cv-02534-JPM-tmp, 2:10-cv-02589-JPM-tmp(McCalla, Jon)

March 23, 2011

Filing 39 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 7 EEOC's MOTION to Dismiss Complaint and Application for Order to Show Cause Why Subpoena Should not be Enforced; Order DENYING AS MOOT 16 Select Family's Motion to Strike Declaration of Katharine Kores. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on 3/22/11. (Pham, Tu)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Select Family of Staffing Companies v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Select Family of Staffing Companies
Represented By:	James R. Mulroy, II
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?