Odyssey Medical, Inc. v. Augen Opticos, S.A. de C.V.
Plaintiff: Odyssey Medical, Inc.
Defendant: Augen Opticos, S.A. de C.V.
Case Number: 2:2010cv02797
Filed: November 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Memphis Office
County: Shelby
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER denying Motion to Dismiss, Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 9/26/2011. 11
June 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER DENYING 24 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr., on 6/27/2011. (Mays, Samuel)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Odyssey Medical, Inc. v. Augen Opticos, S.A. de C.V.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Odyssey Medical, Inc.
Represented By: Richard M. Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Augen Opticos, S.A. de C.V.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?