Ampro Industries, Inc. -v- Dr. Farrah Gray Publishing

Defendant: Dr. Farrah Gray Publishing, LLC
Plaintiff: Ampro Industries, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2012cv02696
Filed: August 10, 2012
Court: Tennessee Western District Court
Office: Memphis Office
County: Shelby
Referring Judge: Diane K. Vescovo
Presiding Judge: Samuel H. Mays
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 28:2201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 29, 2013 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying Motion for Default Judgment Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 5/29/2013.
September 26, 2013 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 15 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr on 09/26/13.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ampro Industries, Inc. -v- Dr. Farrah Gray Publishing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dr. Farrah Gray Publishing, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ampro Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Timothy R. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.