United States of America v. One (1) Ornamental Libation Cup Made of Javan Rhinoceros Horn et al

Claimant: Yiwei Zheng
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: One (1) Ornamental Libation Cup Made of Javan Rhinoceros Horn
Case Number: 2:2012cv02951
Filed: November 1, 2012
Court: Tennessee Western District Court
Office: Memphis Office
County: Shelby
Referring Judge: Tu M. Pham
Presiding Judge: Samuel H. Mays
Nature of Suit: Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action: 49:781 Forfeiture
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. One (1) Ornamental Libation Cup Made of Javan Rhinoceros Horn et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Claimant: Yiwei Zheng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Christopher E. Cotten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One (1) Ornamental Libation Cup Made of Javan Rhinoceros Horn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.