Askew et al v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee; et al
Sterling Askew and Sylvia Askew |
CITY OF MEMPHIS, Toney Armstrong, Ned Aufdenkamp and Timothy Dyess |
Jimmy Moore |
2:2014cv02080 |
February 4, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Memphis Office |
Shelby |
S. Thomas Anderson |
Tu M. Pham |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 302 ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING AND PARTIALLY DENYING MOTION 178 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT CITY OF MEMPHIS. Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 7/8/2016. (Anderson, S.) |
Filing 299 ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING AND PARTIALLY DENYING MOTION 179 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS NED AUFDENKAMP AND TIMOTHY DYESS. Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 6/21/2016. (Anderson, S.) |
Filing 297 ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGES DECISION 289 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE TESTIMONY OF DAVID H. CISCEL, PH.D. Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 5/12/2016. (Anderson, S.) |
Filing 296 ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGES DECISION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF MICHAEL A. KNOX. Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 4/27/2016. (Anderson, S.) |
Filing 295 ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGES DECISION 282 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT GARRY L. MCFADDEN. Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 4/25/2016. (Anderson, S.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.