Lubinski v. Hub Group Trucking, Inc.

Plaintiff: Christian Lubinski
Defendant: Hub Group Trucking, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2014cv02843
Filed: October 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Memphis Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Jon Phipps McCalla
Presiding Judge: Diane K. Vescovo
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER denying 53 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Jon Phipps McCalla on 7/30/2015. (McCalla, Jon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lubinski v. Hub Group Trucking, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christian Lubinski
Represented By: Bryce William Ashby
Represented By: Alejandro Caffarelli
Represented By: William B. Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hub Group Trucking, Inc.
Represented By: Abigail Anne Cahak
Represented By: Kara Lea Goodwin
Represented By: James S. King
Represented By: Thomas James Piskorski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?