Boyd v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Boyd and Genessia Danielle Boyd
Defendant: Colvin and Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 2:2016cv02010
Filed: January 6, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Memphis Office
County: Shelby
Presiding Judge: Diane K Vescovo
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2017 Filing 21 JUDGMENT IN CIVIL CASE. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo on 1/31/2017. (Vescovo, Diane)
November 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo on 11/16/2016. (Vescovo, Diane)
July 18, 2016 Filing 19 Appellant's REPLY BRIEF by Genessia Danielle Boyd. (Olinsky, Howard)
July 5, 2016 Filing 18 Appellee's BRIEF by Carolyn W. Colvin. (Vanasek, Gary)
June 3, 2016 Filing 17 Appellant's BRIEF by Genessia Danielle Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (courtesy copies of citations per L.R. 7.2(i)))(Olinsky, Howard)
May 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Motion to Extend Deadline. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo on 5/2/2016. (Vescovo, Diane)
April 29, 2016 Filing 15 Consent MOTION to Extend Deadline by Genessia Danielle Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Olinsky, Howard)
April 5, 2016 Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (Lipman, Sheryl)
April 4, 2016 Filing 13 ADMINISTRATIVE TRACK SCHEDULING ORDER:. Signed by Clerk of Court on 4/4/2016. (jae)
April 1, 2016 Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Carolyn W. Colvin. (Attachments: #1 Record Part 1, #2 2, #3 3, #4 4, #5 5, #6 6, #7 7, #8 8, #9 9)(Vanasek, Gary)
February 16, 2016 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Genessia Danielle Boyd. Carolyn W. Colvin served on 2/11/2016, answer due 4/11/2016. U.S. Attorney General served on 2/8/2016. U.S. Attorney served on 2/1/2016. (Olinsky, Howard)
January 25, 2016 Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region VII, United States Attorney General, and the United States Attorney's Office. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(wjn)
January 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 1/7/16. (Lipman, Sheryl)
January 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. [**TEXT ORDER ONLY--NO IMAGE ATTACHED**]. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 1/7/16. (Lipman, Sheryl)
January 6, 2016 Filing 7 Summons issued in error.
January 6, 2016 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Administrative track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jrs)
January 6, 2016 Filing 5 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Chief Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo added. (jrs)
January 6, 2016 Filing 4 NOTICE by Genessia Danielle Boyd re #3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0651-2248904) missing page of pro hac vice motion (proposed order to be submitted upon Judge assignment) (Olinsky, Howard)
January 6, 2016 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number 0651-2248904) by Genessia Danielle Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Olinsky, Howard)
January 6, 2016 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (proposed order to be submitted upon Judge assignment) by Genessia Danielle Boyd. (Olinsky, Howard)
January 6, 2016 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Carolyn W. Colvin, filed by Genessia Danielle Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons)(Olinsky, Howard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Gary A. Vanasek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boyd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Genessia Danielle Boyd
Represented By: Howard D. Olinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?