Raymond James & Associates, Inc. v. 50 North Front St. TN, LLC
Plaintiff: Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Defendant: 50 North Front St. TN, LLC
Miscellaneous: Donna L. Russell
Case Number: 2:2018cv02104
Filed: February 16, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Memphis Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Tu M. Pham
Presiding Judge: John T. Fowlkes
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 491 ORDER adopting 455 in part Report and Recommendation and denying 396 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge John Thomas Fowlkes, Jr. on 4/22/2024. (Fowlkes, J.)
June 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 443 ORDER denying 418 Motion for Protective Order; denying 425 Motion for Sanctions; denying 434 Motion to Stay. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on June 6, 2023. (mlj)
May 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 441 ORDER Adopting The Chief Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 392 and Granting 348 Motion for Attorney Fees Awarding Raymond James $242,262 in Fees and Expenses signed by Judge John Thomas Fowlkes, Jr. on 05/16/2023. (Fowlkes, J.)
November 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 360 ORDER Adopting 329 Report and Recommendations; denying 290 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; and finding as moot 297 Motion for Leave to File Counterclaims. Signed by Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. on 11/13/2020. (Fowlkes, J.)
August 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 341 ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's motion for discovery sanctions. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on 8/7/2020. (nph)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 339 ORDER Adopting 301 Report and Recommendations and Granting 54 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. on 7/30/2020. (Fowlkes, J.)
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 318 ORDER denying in part 189 Motion to Compel; denying in part 197 Motion to Compel; denying in part 237 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on 3/30/2020. (nph)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 246 ORDER denying 204 Defendant's Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on 06/25/2019. (jmd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raymond James & Associates, Inc. v. 50 North Front St. TN, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Represented By: Nathaniel L. Prosser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 50 North Front St. TN, LLC
Represented By: David C. Wade
Represented By: John Lewis Wardlaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Miscellaneous: Donna L. Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?