Camden Grove LLC v. Richardson
| Camden Grove LLC |
| Laqueesha Richardson |
| Edward L. Stanton, Jr. |
| 2:2018cv02532 |
| July 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Memphis Office |
| Shelby |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Laqueesha Richardson, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Laqueesha Richardson ( Objections to R&R due by 8/20/2018). Signed by Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton on 8/6/2018. (Claxton, Charmiane)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF REFERRAL, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 03/26/2013. Pursuant to the Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. 631-39 (2006), the Court hereby REFERS to the assigned Magistrate Judge the management of this case; all pretrial matters within the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) for determination; and all other pretrial matters for report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(c). This case shall be "administered to secure [its] just, speedy, and inexpensive determination." Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (csf) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE: Signed agreement to receive notice of electronic filing (NEF) by Laqueesha Richardson (csf) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Laqueesha Richardson. (csf) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Laqueesha Richardson from Shelby County Court of General Sessions, case number 1936125., filed by Laqueesha Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Detainer Warrant Shelby Co. Court of General Sessions 1936125, #2 Defendant's Notice of Filing Notice of Removal to Federal Court, #3 Defendant's Answer, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Judicial Cards)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
