Hannon v. Stryker Corporation
| Barbara Hannon |
| Stryker Corporation |
| Jimmy Moore |
| 2:2018cv02617 |
| September 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| John T Fowlkes |
| Tu M Pham |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| Filing 18 Joint MOTION for Protective Order proposed order submitted by Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-HIPAA Protective Order)(Reecer, Elise) |
| Filing 17 Joint MOTION for Protective Order proposed order submitted by Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Stipulated Protective Order)(Reecer, Elise) |
|
|
|
|
| Filing 14 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham: A Scheduling Conference was held on 10/22/2018. Frank B. Thacher, III and Gary S. Peeples appearing for the plaintiff. John Smith T. on the phone appearing for the defendant. The parties submitted a joint proposed scheduling order. The court discussed the dates and deadlines with the parties. Scheduling Order to be entered. The parties will be notified of the trial date and pretrial conference date by a separate order. (Tape #FTR.) (smm) |
| Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Peeples, Gary) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF SETTING - (TEXT ONLY - NO IMAGE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY): The parties are hereby notified that a SCHEDULING CONFERENCE has been set for Monday, October 22, 2018 at 10:00 AM (CST) in Courtroom 6, before Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham. All parties, including pro se litigants, are expected to comply with Rules 16(b) and 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 16.2. At least three (3) business days prior to the Scheduling Conference, the parties shall email a proposed joint scheduling order to ECF_Judge_Pham@tnwd.uscourts.gov. The proposed joint scheduling order must be based on this court's form order, which can be found at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/JudgePham. Out of town counsel may appear telephonically by dialing the conference line at 877-336-1829, entering Access Code 8263358, and bypassing the security code when prompted, at least five (5) minutes prior to the start of the conference. (TEXT ONLY - NO IMAGE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY)(smm) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION: [TEXT ONLY - NO IMAGE ATTACHED]- The scheduling conference set for Friday, 10/12/18 at 10:30 a.m. before Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr. is CANCELLED per reassignment of case to U.S. Magistrate Judge Pham. (Fowlkes, John) |
|
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Elise Kay Reecer on behalf of Stryker Corporation (Reecer, Elise) |
| Filing 8 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for 10/12/2018 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 3 - Memphis, before Judge John T. Fowlkes Jr. A JOINT proposed scheduling order in WORD format should be submitted at least 4 days prior to the scheduling conference to the ECF propdocs email address, ECF_Judge_Fowlkes@tnwd.uscourts.gov. Please follow Judge Fowlkes scheduling guidelines at https://connection.tnwd.circ6.dcn. Counsel should be prepared to set case deadlines and discuss case status and all pending motions at the conference. Following the scheduling conference, the approved order will be filed by the Case Manager. (pyb) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Stryker Corporation.(Hollabaugh, Lela) |
| Filing 3 Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr and Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae) Modified on 9/6/2018 (jae). |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Stryker Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Stryker Corporation for Stryker Corporation.. (Hollabaugh, Lela) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Stryker Corporation from Shelby County Circuit Court at Memphis, case number CT-003484-18-I (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-2872706), filed by Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B-Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hollabaugh, Lela) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.