Pigues et al v. H & M International Transportation et al
Plaintiff: Eric Pigues and Tise Pigues
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company, H & M International Transportation, Jeremy K Scott and Technical Services International, Mi-Jack Products Inc.
Undetermined: Donna L. Russell
Case Number: 2:2018cv02680
Filed: October 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Thomas L Parker
Referring Judge: Diane K Vescovo
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2018 Filing 31 SETTING LETTER: Proposed Pretrial Order due by 12/13/2019. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/20/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 2 - Memphis before Judge Thomas L. Parker. Jury Trial (5 days) set for 1/13/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Thomas L. Parker. (mlk)
November 27, 2018 Filing 29 Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company's ANSWER to Complaint First Amended by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Robbins, Wayne)
November 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 11/21/2018. (pab)
November 20, 2018 Filing 30 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Thomas L. Parker; Scheduling Conference held on 11/20/2018. David Peel appeared for the Plaintiff. Scott Campbell appeared for H&M and Jeremy Scott. Lynn Roberts appeared for Norfolk Southern Railway Co. Plaintiff is now back at work. Plaintiff filed a new Compliant adding TSI (the company who supplied and did maintenance to the cable.) Norfolk will non-suite the case against H&M International Transportation. the Court set scheduling dates. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 12/13/2019. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/20/2019 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 2 - Memphis before Judge Thomas L. Parker. Jury Trial (5 days) set for 1/13/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Thomas L. Parker. (Court Reporter, Cathy Best) (mlk)
November 19, 2018 Filing 27 ANSWER to #10 Answer to Complaint,, Crossclaim, by H & M International Transportation.(Campbell, Scott)
November 16, 2018 Filing 26 Summons Issued as to Technical Services International, Mi-Jack Products Inc.. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jae)
November 16, 2018 Filing 25 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Technical Services International, Mi-Jack Products Inc., filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Peel, David)
November 16, 2018 Filing 24 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #23 Notice of Summons filed by Eric Pigues, Tise Pigues has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: Filer was granted permission to file an amended complaint adding an additional party, but counsel has not published the amended complaint and added the additional party. Clerk's office will issue new summons once the amended complaint has been published adding the additional party TSI MJ. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (jae)
November 16, 2018 Filing 23 NOTICE of Summons by David Britton Peel on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons to be issued to New Defendant, TSI MJ)(Peel, David)
November 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER Granting #21 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 11/15/2018. (pab)
November 14, 2018 Filing 21 First MOTION to Amend/Correct #18 First MOTION to Amend/Correct COMPLAINT TO ADD PARTIES - (WITH PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER) to add signature by All Plaintiffs. (Peel, David)
November 14, 2018 Filing 20 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #18 First MOTION to Amend/Correct COMPLAINT TO ADD PARTIES - (WITH PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER) filed by Eric Pigues, Tise Pigues has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: Motion does not contain the electronic signature of the filing attorney. Please resubmit as a notice of correction, which will allow you to connect the corrected document to #18 . Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. The filer has one business day to correct the deficiency. (jae)
November 14, 2018 Filing 19 COURTESY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #18 First MOTION to Amend/Correct COMPLAINT TO ADD PARTIES - (WITH PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER) filed by Eric Pigues, Tise Pigues has been filed. For future reference, please note : Proposed orders should not be published to CM/ECF, but only emailed to presiding judge's chambers. If no order previously emailed (in word format), please do so upon receipt of this notice. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. Filer is not required to resubmit document. (jae)
November 13, 2018 Filing 18 * REFILED AT #21 * First MOTION to Amend/Correct COMPLAINT TO ADD PARTIES - (WITH PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER) by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memo in Support of Motion to Amend Complaint, #2 Exhibit Amended Complaint Proposed & Consented to, #3 Exhibit PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER)(Peel, David) *Modified on 11/15/2018 (jae).
November 9, 2018 Filing 17 REQUEST for Production of Documents by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Robbins, Wayne) (Main Document 17 replaced on 11/9/2018) (mlk).
November 9, 2018 Filing 16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting Written Report. (Robbins, Wayne)
November 9, 2018 Filing 15 INTERROGATORIES Propounded to Jeffery K. Scott by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Robbins, Wayne)
November 9, 2018 Filing 14 INTERROGATORIES Propounded to Mrs. Pigues by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Robbins, Wayne)
November 9, 2018 Filing 13 REQUEST for Production of Documents by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Medical Authorization)(Robbins, Wayne)
November 9, 2018 Filing 12 INTERROGATORIES Propounded to Mr. Pigues by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Robbins, Wayne)
November 9, 2018 Filing 11 REQUEST for Production of Documents by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 IRS Tax Release Authorization, #2 Medical Authorization)(Robbins, Wayne)
October 26, 2018 Filing 10 Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand , CROSSCLAIM against H & M International Transportation by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Robbins, Wayne)
October 26, 2018 Filing 9 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for 11/20/2018 at 02:10 PM in Courtroom 2 - Memphis before Judge Thomas L. Parker. (mlk)
October 4, 2018 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by H & M International Transportation, Jeremy K Scott.(Campbell, Scott)
October 4, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Charles Campbell on behalf of H & M International Transportation, Jeremy K Scott (Campbell, Scott)
October 2, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth O. Cooper on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company (Cooper, Kenneth)
October 1, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jld)
October 1, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jld)
October 1, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jld)
October 1, 2018 Filing 2 Judge Thomas L. Parker and Chief Magistrate Judge Diane K. Vescovo added. (jld)
October 1, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Norfolk Southern Railway Company from Shelby County Circuit Court, case number CT-003829-18 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-2892135), filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cooper, Kenneth)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pigues et al v. H & M International Transportation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Represented By: Kenneth O. Cooper
Represented By: Wayne Lindsey Robbins, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: H & M International Transportation
Represented By: Scott Charles Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeremy K Scott
Represented By: Scott Charles Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Technical Services International, Mi-Jack Products Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Pigues
Represented By: David Britton Peel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tise Pigues
Represented By: David Britton Peel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Undetermined: Donna L. Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?