Slay v. IB Travelin, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: Barbara Ann Hunt Slay
Defendant: IB Travelin, Inc. and Domiruth Travel Services
Case Number: 2:2018cv02728
Filed: October 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Presiding Judge: Samuel H Mays
Referring Judge: Tu M Pham
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2018 Filing 15 ******OOPS****** Please disregard 11/14/2018 (jld). Modified on 11/14/2018 (jld).
November 14, 2018 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by William David Darnell on behalf of IB Travelin, Inc. (Darnell, William)
November 13, 2018 Filing 13 MOTION Alternative Service of Process on Defendant Domiruth Travel Services, SAC proposed order submitted by Barbara Ann Hunt Slay. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Affidavit)(Walk, William)
November 13, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Tracy A. Overstreet on behalf of IB Travelin, Inc. (Overstreet, Tracy)
November 12, 2018 Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Barbara Ann Hunt Slay. IB Travelin, Inc. waiver sent on 10/24/2018, answer due 12/24/2018. (Walk, William)
November 12, 2018 Filing 10 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to IB Travelin, Inc. on 10/24/2018 by Barbara Ann Hunt Slay. Waiver of Service due by 11/23/2018. (Walk, William)
November 9, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by William Walk, Jr on behalf of Barbara Ann Hunt Slay (Walk, William)
October 19, 2018 Filing 8 COURTESY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #6 Summons Issued, #7 Summons Issued, has been filed. The name and address of the attorney the answer is to sent to is missing form the summons. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. (jld)
October 19, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Domiruth Travel Services. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jld)
October 19, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to IB Travelin, Inc.. The filer has been notified electronically that the summons has been issued, and the new docket entry reflects this. Upon notification of the new docket entry, the filer is to print the issued summons in order to effect service. (jld)
October 19, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jld)
October 19, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jld)
October 19, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jld)
October 19, 2018 Filing 2 Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr and Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jld)
October 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCE, GROSS NEGLIGENCE, RECKLESSNESS AND WRONGFUL DEATH against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-2907338), filed by Barbara Ann Hunt Slay. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for IB Travelin, Inc., #3 Summons for Domiruth)(Jacobson, Carl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Slay v. IB Travelin, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: IB Travelin, Inc.
Represented By: William David Darnell
Represented By: Tracy A. Overstreet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Domiruth Travel Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Ann Hunt Slay
Represented By: Carl I. Jacobson
Represented By: William B. Walk, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?