Boone et al v. Beasley et al
| Kevin Cornelius Smith and Queen E Boone |
| JOHN DOE-1, Jasmine Beasley and Knight Transportation, Inc. |
| Jimmy Moore |
| 2:2018cv02774 |
| November 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Charmiane G Claxton |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 DEFICIENCY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #8 Notice (Other) filed by Kevin Cornelius Smith, Queen E Boone has been filed. However, the following deficiency has been found: Document should not have been published to CM/ECF. There is a message at bottom of form to email the form, not return to a judge. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. (jae) |
| Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Kevin Smith. (jae) |
| Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Queen Boone. (jae) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Queen E Boone, Kevin Cornelius Smith (Williams, Juan) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Knight Transportation, Inc..(Baskette, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jld) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jld) |
| Filing 3 COURTESY NOTICE: Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, document #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Knight Transportation, Inc. has been filed. Please note the date on page 3 is missing. Please refer to the #ECF User Manual and #ECF Policies and Procedures. (jld) |
| Filing 2 Judge Thomas L. Parker and Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton added. (jld) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Knight Transportation, Inc. from Circuit Court Shelby County, Tennessee, case number CT-004484-18 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-2920609), filed by Knight Transportation, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Process and Pleadings)(Baskette, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
