Blackburn v. Attorney General of USA, et al
| Robert Blackburn |
| Memphis Police, Attorney General of USA and Unamed FBI Agents |
| 2:2018cv02799 |
| November 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Samuel H Mays |
| Tu M Pham |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Case initiation fee: PAID $ 400.00, receipt number M4676040670 (csf) |
| Filing 5 Mail #4 Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Robert Blackburn. (jae) |
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY FULL $400 CIVIL FILING FEE, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 11/20/2018. (Mays, Samuel)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 2 Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Blackburn. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Statement)(csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 filed by Robert Blackburn against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope, #3 Judicial Cards)(csf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
