Bailey v. Roco-Woods LLC d/b/a The Woods at Ridgeway
| Lidarius Bailey |
| Roco-Woods, LLC |
| Temiika Gipson |
| 2:2018cv02801 |
| November 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Sheryl H Lipman |
| Tu M Pham |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SETTING LETTER: Jury Trial set for Tuesday, 1/21/2020 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. Pretrial Conference set for Friday, 1/10/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 1/3/2020. (tlh) |
| Filing 10 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman: Scheduling Conference held on 1/8/2019. Bill Wade appearing for the Plaintiff. Cary Wyatt appearing for Defendant. Dates/deadlines established: Jury Trial set for Tuesday, 1/21/2020 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. Trial estimated to take 2 days. Pretrial Conference set for Friday, 1/10/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 1/3/2020. Scheduling order to enter. (Court Reporter: Lisa Mayo)(2:25-2:39) (tlh) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Sheryl H. Lipman on 1/8/19. (Lipman, Sheryl)
|
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting . (Wyatt, Carl) |
| Filing 7 SETTING LETTER: Scheduling Conference set for Tuesday, 1/8/2019 at 1:00 PM in Courtroom 1 - Memphis before Judge Sheryl H. Lipman. (tlh) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by All Defendants.(Wyatt, Carl) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (jae) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (jae) |
| Filing 2 Judge Sheryl H. Lipman and Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham added. (jae) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Circuit Court Shelby County, case number CT-004695-18 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ATNWDC-2926206), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit state court complaint)(Wyatt, Carl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
