Jones v. Mayble et al
| Deandre LaWendell Jones |
| Sgt. Huggin and Sgt. F/N/U Mayble |
| 2:2018cv02875 |
| December 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Thomas L Parker |
| Tu M Pham |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER Granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Assessing Filing Fee. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 2/11/19. (jgb)
|
| Filing 5 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Deandre LaWendell Jones. (Attachments: #1 Trust Fund Statment, #2 Envelope)(jae) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Huggin, F/N/U Mayble, filed by Deandre LaWendell Jones. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(jae) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint and to Comply with 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1)-(2) or Pay the Entire $400 Civil Filing Fee. Signed by Judge Thomas L. Parker on 1/16/19. (jgb)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT filed by Deandre LaWendell Jones against Huggin, F/N/U Mayble. (Attachments: #1 Indigency documents, #2 judges' cards)(agj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
